106425814840222281
from jordon.cooper comes a link to this article by brian.mclaren. a few tidbits and commentary on each of the three streams. first, regarding spiritual formation:
The switch suggests a change in the questions people are asking. Instead of “How can I be right in my belief so I can go to heaven?” the new question seems to be, “How can we live life to the full so God’s will is done on earth as it is in heaven?”
In this setting, preaching both loses and gains status. Instead of an exercise in transferring information so that people have a coherent, well-formed “worldview” (often an upbeat name for “systematic theology”), preaching in the emerging culture aims at inspiring transformation. It is in a sense demoted from the center of public worship, bookended by bumper music. It steps down from its pedestal to join singing, the Lord’s Supper, prayer, silence, and recitation as one formative ritual or practice among many.
This apparent demotion can actually be a promotion: preaching becomes less and less a well-reasoned argument, and more and more a shared practice among preacher and hearers, in which the Word runs among us like rivulets across a meadow after rain, nourishing fresh green life to spring up. The preacher becomes the leader of a kind of group meditation, less scholar and more sage, less lecturer and more poet, prophet, priest.
i find this sentiment resonating strongly within me. some in our church tell me they want more in depth preaching, but this request comes from a position of ignorance - not of God, for they know enough of Him to get by for quite some time; but rather of what they truly need to live abundently. we who are churched do not fail to live lives of transformation for lack of knowledge. we fail for lack of experience. we lack an awareness of God’s abiding presence. the rituals that will inspire transformation, then, will not center on communication of the word, but on communion with the Word.
on the stream of authentic community:
So, this quest for community challenges us not to seek community as a commodity, but rather to pursue love (which is patient, kind, not rude, etc.) as a practice, which yields community as a byproduct. We’re working against a lot in the quest—not only our native selfishness and surliness, but also massive systemic problems, like these:
1. Our dependence on automobiles which isolate us in little glass and metal boxes, transporting us from the glass and concrete boxes of our workplaces, shopping malls, and church buildings to the glass and gypsum boxes of our homes, where we watch the world happen in the plastic and silicon boxes we call TV sets and computer screens. This auto-dependency turns neighborhoods into bedroom communities (an oxymoron), so we sleep, not in communities, but in housing developments. Front porches are gone; back decks have replaced them. Nobody walks down the streets anymore, or if they do, they’re too preoccupied on their cell phones to wave and say hi to a neighbor, much less slow down and sit a spell.
2. Our manic pace of life that wants community, but fast, like French fries, and without the grease.
3. Our transience, which means right about the time we, against all odds, get close to a circle of friends, half of them will up and move away.
echos of an earlier conversation with karl, paul, and LT. the creation of a small group ministry program is not the solution. (though, i might be inclined to agree with mclaren that it is probably better than nothing.) what is needed is a series of commitments - one individual after another - commitments to live in community; to live with intentionality; to live transparently; to live in love; to go against the flow, the societal trends that divide.
and finally, the stream of mission:
How different is this missional approach to the “rhetoric of exclusion” that worked so well in modernity: “There are blessings to being on the inside. You’re on the outside and so can’t enjoy them. Want to be a blessed insider like us?”
In contrast, missional Christianity says, “God is expressing his love to all outsiders through our acts of kindness and service. You’re invited to leave your life of accumulation and competition and self-centeredness to join us in this mission of love, blessing, and peace. Want to join in the mission?”
i think this is the most difficult transition for those in my faith community. rather than focusing on the alter call, the response card, the raised hand at the end of the service - which is wonderfully easy to measure, remember, report, celebrate - the focus shifts to a lifestyle of love and service. church life becomes messy b/c you can’t tell who is in and who is out… not that it matters. (but, oh how it matters to the modern evangelical!) echos of “open-set” theology here.
it’ll probably show that i’ve put this post together while doing other things at work. hopefully it’ll make some sense tomorrow and provide oppotunity for conversation.
22 September, 2003